Lets review,
If government can hide its operations behind fines and jail
time, how long before the rest of our freedoms slip away? That’s the serious
question raised by AB 2624, a bill moving quickly through the California
Legislature in Sacramento as of April 2026.
Authored by Assemblymember Mia
Bonta, the measure expands California’s “Safe at Home” confidentiality program
to cover employees and volunteers at taxpayer-funded immigration support
organizations. On the surface, it aims to protect people from harassment. In
practice, it would let these groups demand the removal of publicly posted
photos, videos, or personal information if they claim it causes “harassment.”
Penalties include steep civil fines—starting in the thousands of
dollars—misdemeanor charges, up to a year in jail, and forced takedowns, often
without a full court process first.
Critics, including Assemblymember Carl DeMaio, have dubbed it the “Stop Nick Shirley Act.” Independent journalist Nick Shirley has used public filming to expose alleged fraud in government-funded programs involving tens or hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars. The bill, they argue, could chill exactly that kind of oversight.
This isn’t just bad policy—it runs headlong into the U.S. Constitution. The First Amendment protects the right to film in public spaces, investigate how our tax dollars are spent, and hold government accountable. The Supreme Court has made clear that such speech lies at the core of what the Founders intended to safeguard. AB 2624 creates a content-based restriction and prior restraint, letting private parties trigger penalties and removals without proving the speech is unprotected. When state law collides with federal constitutional rights, the Constitution wins.
A person is entitled to knock on the door of any home and politely ask, “Would you be interested in talking about my religion?” In the same way, a reporter—or any citizen—has every right to walk up to the front door of a commercial business and ask questions, especially when that business receives government funding or contracts at any level. Public accountability demands public access.
George Washington understood this deeply. In his 1796
Farewell Address, he declared:
“In proportion as the structure of a
government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opinion
should be enlightened.”
He also reminded us,
“I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than
to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy.”
And he
affirmed that...
“truth will ultimately prevail where there are pains taken
to bring it to light.”
Washington wasn’t calling for polite press releases. He was demanding real transparency so citizens could guide their own government. Hiding behind “harassment” claims to shield potential waste and fraud betrays that vision.
It’s time to jump on the bandwagon for good. The truth and sunshine on what is fair and just must remain part of the public discourse. Outing crime, waste, and false narratives has to be openly debated—just as the Framers of our Constitution envisioned when they made freedom of speech and press the first and strongest check on power.
Transparency isn’t harassment; it’s the foundation of a free
republic. Defeat AB 2624. Tell your Legislature!
Whoever represents you in Sacramento tell them
to Vote No.
https://www.270towin.com/elected-officials/california
Your calls and Emails will matter to them. ( we hope )
Demand sunlight on every tax dollar. Share the facts, support real oversight, and remember: an informed public is the ultimate guardian of your and my liberty.
What are your thoughts? Drop them in the comments below and share this post if you believe We The People have a right to see, and talk about, what’s happening with their own money.
Stay vigilant,
#BandwagonForGood
We have to exit this current Age of DisEnlightemnmet with freedom
intact.
#DisEnlightemnmet



